Hi Sumeet,
I have a requirement to transpose the records with 'each stock type present in different rows' into a 'single row with each stock type in a different column'. So im planning to use an ANV in a CV multiple times with different stock type filters applied on each projection node and use union node to achieve it. I've seen some blogs on transpose using hana modelling and understood that 'creating different ANVs' or 'reusing same ANVs multiple times with different filters applied in projection node' will not have much difference in performance. But if we use scripted CV, we can handle it in a better way (extract the required data once from larger set and use it for further calculations with different fitlers in parallel). So i wanted to understand whether graphical approach performs better or do we need to go for scripted CV in this scenario.
Thanks,
Satish